Last evening I ventured outward into the world and watched Le Scaphandre et le Papillon, aka The Diving Bell and the Butterfly (English International title), at the Balboa Theater in San Francisco.
I had wanted to see this film, as it was quite well reviewed and a fascinating story, but my wife and I were forced to watch it at the insistence of Carrie’s Great Aunt.
The first half of the film was entirely from the perspective of Jean-Dominique Bauby, a well-known French journalist and editor of Elle magazine. The film begins as he is in his hospital bed, awakening to discover he had suffered a stroke and was paralyzed excepting the use of his left eye. The director chooses to show the film as if the camera is his good eye; fluttering and with flashes of light as he gazes around his world, blinking to communicate.
Carrie and I thought the film was very good. The film’s cinematography was beautiful and an effective conveyance of the feeling of being trapped in one’s own paralyzed body.
My wife’s relatives left half way through the film due to boredom, leaving us alone in the theater for most of the film. Their point of critique was that the film had a slow pace and was boring. Personally, I thought that the tedium and slow-pacing was an effective technique to employ in order for the audience to comprehend the day-to-day life of the person about whom the film was portraying.
This movie’s gorgeous experimental cinematography and fascinating story merit a rating of 87 (+/- 3), although it is not for everybody…